Wilson's theorem
In mathematics, Wilson's Theorem states that a natural number n > 1 is prime if and only if:
| Table of contents |
|
2 Proofs 3 Applications 4 Generalization |
The theorem was first discovered by John Wilson, a student of the English mathematician Edward Waring. Waring announced the theorem in 1770, although neither could prove it. Lagrange gave the first proof in 1773. There is evidence that Leibniz was aware of the result a century earlier, but he never published it.
This proof uses the fact that if p is an odd prime, then the set of numbers G = (Z/pZ)× = {1, 2, ... p − 1} forms a group under multiplication modulo p. This means that for each i in G, there is a unique inverse j in G such that ij ≡ 1 (mod p). If i ≡ j (mod p), then i2 ≡ 1 (mod p), which forces i2 − 1 = (i + 1)(i − 1) ≡ 0 (mod p), and since p is prime, this forces i ≡ 1 or −1 (mod p), i.e. i = 1 or i = p − 1.
In other words, 1 and p − 1 are each their own inverse, but every other element of G has a distinct inverse, and so if we collect the elements of G pairwise in this fashion and multiply them all together, we get the product −1. For example, if p = 11, we have
Here is another proof of the first direction: Suppose p is an odd prime. Consider the polynomial
But since p is odd, the constant term of f(x) is just (p − 1)! + 1, and the result follows.
Wilson's theorem is useless as a primality test, since computing (n − 1)! is difficult for large n.
Using Wilson's Theorem, we have for any prime p:
There is also a generalization of Wilson's theorem, due to Carl Friedrich Gauss:
History
Proofs
First proof
If p = 2, the result is trivial to check. For the converse, suppose the congruence holds for a composite n, and note that then n has a proper divisor d with 1 < d < n. Clearly, d divides (n − 1)! But by the congruence, d also divides (n − 1)! + 1, so that d divides 1, a contradiction.Second proof
Recall that if f(x) is a nonzero polynomial of degree d over a field F, then f(x) has at most d roots over F. Now, with g(x) as above, consider the polynomial
Since the leading coefficients cancel, we see that f(x) is a polynomial of degree p − 2. Reducing mod p, we see that f(x) has at most p − 2 roots mod p. But by Fermat's theorem, each of the elements 1,2,...,p − 1 is a root of f(x). This is impossible, unless f(x) is identically zero mod p, i.e. unless each coefficient of f(x) is divisible by p.Applications
where p = 2m + 1. This becomes:
And so primality is determined by the quadratic residues of p. We can use this fact to prove part of a famous result: −1 is a square (quadratic residue) mod p if p ≡ 1 (mod 4). For suppose p = 4k + 1 for some integer k. Then we can take m = 2k above, and we conclude thatGeneralization
where p is an odd prime.