The Shunyata reference article from the English Wikipedia on 24-Apr-2004
(provided by Fixed Reference: snapshots of Wikipedia from wikipedia.org)

Shunyata

Buddhism
Terms and concepts
People
Schools and sects
Texts
Timeline
Temples
Culture
Buddhism by region
List of topics

Śūnyatā, शून्यता (Sanskrit, Pali: '''suññatā '''), or "Emptiness," is a concept sometimes associated with Nagarjuna and the Madhyamaka school, but bearing deeper roots in the doctrines of Anatta (Pali, Sanskrit:Anātman) (the rejection of the mainstream Indian concept of a soul or Ātman) and Paticcasamuppada (Pali, Sanskrit: pratītyasamūtpāda) (Interdependent Arising). It signifies the nonsubstantiality or lack of essential nature of everything one encounters in life. (i.e., that everything is empty of substance, being, soul, essence, etc.) Everything is inter-related, never self-sufficient or independent; nothing has independent reality.

The scholar Walpola Rahula explains that once Ananda the attendant asked Gautama Buddha, "People say the word Sunya. What is Sunya?" The Buddha replied, "Ananda, there is no self, nor anything pertaining to self in this world. Therefore, the world is empty." Related to the concept of Sunyata is the notion of the store-consciousness in Mahayana Buddhism which has its seed in the Theravada texts.

Table of contents
1


2 See also

==śūnyatā

in the Perfection of Wisdom Sutras==

In the Heart Sutra

The Heart Sutra declares that the skandhas, which constitute our mental and physical existence, are empty in their nature or essence, i.e., empty of any such nature or essence. But it also declares that this emptiness is the same as form (which connotes fulness)--i.e., that this is an emptiness which is at the same time not different from the kind of reality which we normally subscribe to events; it is not a nihilistic emptiness that undermines our world, but a "positive" emptiness which defines it.

==śūnyatā
in Nāgārjuna
==

For Nāgārjuna , who provided the most important philosophical formulation of śūnyatā , emptiness as the mark of all phenomena means is a natural consequence of dependent origination; indeed, he identifies the two. In his analysis, any enduring essential nature (i.e., fullness) would prevent the process of dependent origination, would prevent any kind of origination at all, for things would simply always have been and always continue to be. That things happen is proof that things lack the kind of nature attributed to them in mainstream Indian metaphysics.

An interesting consequence of this is that this enables Nāgārjuna

to put forth a bold argument regarding the relation of nirvāṇa
and saṃ
sā ra. If all phenomenal events (i.e., the events that constitute saṃ sā ra are empty, then they are empty of any compelling ability to cause suffering. For Nāgārjuna , nirvāṇa
is neither something added to saṃ
sā ra nor any process of taking away from it (i.e., removing the enlightened being from it). In other words, nirvāṇa
is simply saṃ
sā ra rightly experienced in light of a proper understanding of the emptiness of all things.

See also

External Links