Brazil (movie)

For people who check facts

Brazil (first released on February 20, 1985) is a dystopic comedy film directed by Monty Python member Terry Gilliam, and written by him, Charles McKeown, and Tom Stoppard. Jonathan Pryce stars. Robert De Niro, Kim Greist, Michael Palin, Katherine Helmond, Bob Hoskins and Ian Holm are also featured.

Warning: Plot details follow.

Table of contents

1 Synopsis
2 Analysis
3 Production and Release History
4 Points to Consider after Several Viewings
5 Understanding "Brazil" -- England as a counter-terrorist state
6 External links

Synopsis

Set "somewhere in the 20th century", the world of Brazil is a gritty urban hellhole patched over with cosmetic surgery and "designer ducts for your discriminating taste". Automation pervades every facet of life from the toaster and coffee machine to doorways, but paperwork, inefficiency, and mechanical failure are the rule.

The story begins with Sam Lowry (Pryce), a low-level bureaucrat whose primary interests in life are his vivid dream fantasies to the tune of a 1940s big-band hit "Brazil", inadverently getting involved with terrorist intrigue when his dream girl (Greist) turns up as the neighbor of a man ("Buttle") arrested as a terrorist on account of a typographical error. Other people in Sam's life include Harry (DeNiro), the terrorist who is actually a renegade heating technician; Jack (Palin), a family man and childhood friend of Sam's whose actual occupation is a government torturer; and Sam's mother (Helmond), who undergoes a series of increasingly disturbingly effective cosmetic surgeries.

A mysterious wave of terrorist bombings is met by an increasingly powerful Ministry of Information, whose jackbooted thugs never admit to arresting and torturing the wrong man. Sam's simultaneous pursuit of the truth and the girl draws him into the higher echelons of the Ministry, despite Jack's repeated efforts to warn him that his quest will inevitably bring Sam into more danger than he can cope with.

Analysis

Gilliam refers to this film as the second of a trilogy of movies, including Time Bandits (1981) and The Adventures of Baron Munchausen (1989). He notes that the three films share a related theme of the struggle for imagination and free thinking in a world constantly suppressing such ideas.

Unfortunately the plot has some major confusing points, the most notable being the instant hate-to-love transition made by the female lead for the hero Sam.

With its complex, subtle, and confusing plot, packed with jokes and ideas, Brazil is a movie to be watched several times. It is also packed with visual detail.

Production and Release History

Universal chairman Sid Sheinberg and Gilliam disagreed over the film; Sheinberg insisted on drastically reediting the film to give it a happy ending, which Gilliam resisted vigorously.

The movie was shelved by Universal, but Brazil promptly won the Los Angeles Film Critics Association award for "Best Picture". That, coupled with a full- page Variety ad taken out by Gilliam questioning Sheinberg, shamed Universal into finally releasing Gilliam's version in 1985.

Upon release, however, Brazil performed poorly at the box office. Audiences were confused. Nonetheless, the film remains a cult favorite, particularly among Gilliam's fans. In tone and setting, Gilliam's later reality-twisting Twelve Monkeys resembles Brazil. It has also, inevitably, been compared to George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four.

Sheinberg's edit, the so-called "Love Conquers All" version, was shown on network television, and is available as an extra on the Criterion DVD release of the film.

Points to Consider after Several Viewings

So, when does Sam lose contact with reality? Does he undergo a lobotomy or is his final escapism merely a consequence of severe torture inflicted by a former good friend? Are daydreams good or do they blur the distinction between fantasy and reality for everybody?
Do the terrorists exist at all, or is it just a coverup for the incompetence of Central Services (et al) when all the technology fails? Perhaps the bombings are staged to justify the information department's existence. Or perhaps they are caused by some sort of faulty equipment.
Does Tuttle exist at all, or he just another of Sam's daydream fantasies? In fact, isn't it really Sam himself who tampers with the air conditioning? No one else really meets Tuttle (although he does make an exit when Sam's girlfriend appears!)
Is the hate-to-love transition inconsistent, or is it that Sam struggles a lot to prove himself worthy to her? When this love-transition finally comes, is it not exactly where Sam loses touch with reality completely?
Notice the society portayed. Companies and government all meld together. Their technology level is quite high, but all the wrong things are automated, and they are extremely poorly designed. (They put energy into designer ducts, when no one really wants those ducts at all. Computers and telephones are also beautiful examples, half modern, half Victorian). Due to these misdesigns (driven by a central authority), simply everybody is incompetent at what they do.
What similarities exist between the movie and the societies of United Kingdom under Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher (1979 - 1990) or the United States under President Ronald Reagan (1981 - 1989)? After all, isn't the film contemporary to the IRA bombings in London?
What is the deeper meaning of all the dream sequences? While some of them are clear, many seem to be confusing to the point that the viewer will dismiss them as "just dreams". It should be noted that due to budget problems Gilliam was unable to shoot many of dream sequences he had planned.

Understanding "Brazil" -- England as a counter-terrorist state

See "Brazil" first, then see "In the Name of the Father" starring Daniel Day-Lewis, Pete Postlethwaite, and Emma Thompson, and "Brazil" will suddenly make sense. The subject that "In the Name of the Father" deals with in the mode of realistic drama, "Brazil" deals with in [[Black comedy | dark humor]] and fantasy.

Many of us in the U.S. know of the "tactical campaign" of the IRA in Northern Ireland, but the IRA also conducted a strategic campaign of attacks on the British homeland in London and other parts of England. Such attacks have a direct effect in terms of terror upon the civilian population, but they also have an indirect effect in terms of reaction to those attacks and the way that reaction affects not only civil liberties but the overall civility of the culture.

The name "Brazil" is also the name of a Latin-rhythm popular song, not only the theme music of the movie but which also initiates the fantasy sequences of the main character. The movie plainly is about England and not a South American country, but it is suggested that England had been going down the path of the English and U.S. stereotype of a South American country: people have become adapted to the attacks of terrorists, where the attacks have become so institutionalized that the grievances of the terrorists and perhaps even their identities have become forgotten, and while the authorities fight back against the terrorists, the counter-terrorist program has become institutionalized to the point where it is not clear that it has any effect on the terrorists or even if the original terrorists exist any longer.

The term "information retrieval" is used throughout the film, and one is quite a long way into the film before one figures out that information retrieval is a euphemism for torture. It is quite chilling that such an innocuous and bureaucratic term would be used for something so brutal, and the torture methods depicted in the movie are brutal. Also, the movie begins with a society that is crazy enough to be a fantasy, but the fantasies become so outrageous that at some point the action is taking place inside the mind of the main character. The main character is being tortured, so perhaps the fantasies begin at the start of the movie, but in a way, it doesn't matter.

As to the failure of the film at the box office, "Brazil" can be contrasted with "Dr. Strangelove" , directed by Stanley Kubrick. While "Brazil" dealt with the socially corrosive effect of a terrorist war, "Dr. Strangelove" dealt with the equally serious topic of atomic war. "Dr. Strangelove" was a mixture of satire and camp, but the context of that film was more accessible to the movie audience.