Bigfoot

Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot

Bigfoot is a large creature said to inhabit the wilderness of the US Pacific Northwest and southwestern Canada. An alternative name is Sasquatch, derived from a Northwest Coast Native American term.

Along with the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot is perhaps the most famout cryptid in Cryptozoology.

While Bigfoot may or may not exist, a Bigfoot culture of mostly amatuer researchers is active. Some professionals have deemed such groups worthy of study as a movement or subculture.

Most mainstream scientists have found existing Sasquatch evidence unpersuasive, and consider such evidence and sightings the product of mythology, folklore, misidentification or hoaxes. Some professionals and academics have argued that while current evidence may be lacking, evidence should be evaluated objectively as it arrises.

Others--including many amateurs--continue research and consider the existence of Sasquatch a possibility.

Table of contents

1 Description 1.1 Arguments against 1.2 Arguments for 1.3 Notable Bigfoot sightings and reports 1.4 Footnotes 1.5 See also 2 External link

Description

Witnessess generally report similar features: A large, apelike bipedal creature usually 7 to 9 feet tall, broad shouldered and strongly built. The head is small and pointed; sometimes a low crest or ridge is reported on top of the skull. They eyes are usually described as small, hidden below a pronounced brow. Excepting the face, hands and feet, short shaggy hair covers the body. Hair is usually black, though brown, rust, sandy or silver hair are also reported.

Most sightings are at night, leading to speculation that sasquatch are nocturnal. Individuals are usually reported, though some witnessess report pairs of family groups.

Arguments against

• In Northern Europe there was formerly a parallel belief in Trolls, which some have suggested is similar to Bigfoot legends.

• Many claims of eyewitness sightings have been made, and both home movies and photographs said to be of Bigfoot exist, although they are generally of poor quality. There are also audio recordings of purported sasquatches.

• Ray Wallace claimed to have produced a substabtial amount of hoaxed evidence from 1958 onward in a prank that continued beyond his expectations. Wallace's family published many of the details following his death in 2002. Wallace's assertions are often considered a serious blow against Bigfoot claims.

• Most of the areas where Bigfoot has been reported are near habitats of bears, notably including the Grizzly Bear. Grizzly bears are large and furry, and occasionally stand up on their hind legs, prompting the suggestion that many of the "Bigfoot" sightings were in fact bears. Some reports, however, originate with people familiar with bears, who claim that what they saw was not a bear.

• At least one film (the Patterson-Gimlin film) shows something that is definitely not a bear, and this film was for a long time considered the strongest evidence for Bigfoot. Ray Wallace claimed to have been involved hoaxing the film. Some have accepted Wallace's claims and consider the film phony, while others have not accepted Wallace's statements.
  • Rumors circulated that the creature seen in the Patterson-Gimlin film was a suit designed by special effects legend John Chambers. Some reports state that film director John Landis started such rumors. Chambers designed the ape costumes seen in many of the original Planet of the Apes films, and was reportedly an acquaintance of Ray Wallace and Bob Gimlin. In an October 26, 1997 interview with Bigfoot researcher Bobbie Short, Chambers denied any knowledge of the Patterson film before its public exposure, and further denied any involvement in a hoax. Chambers stated he was good at his craft, but "not that good" when it came to creating such a purported disguise. (Loren Coleman & Jerome Clark, Cryptozoology A to Z, p 56)

  • Curiously, the costume posesses both a male sagittal crest (as in gorillass) and pendulous female breasts (like human and chimpanzee females).

• The theory (perhaps more correctly termed hypothesis) that sasquatch might be a late surviving representative of the Gigantopithicus is generally considered highly speculative. Rigorous studies of the existing fossilized remains seem to indicate that it is the common ancestor of two quadrupedal genera, represented by the sivapithecus and the Orangutan. As the likelihood that these two modern animals would be descended from a bipedal animal does not seem plausible or probable to scientists, the current consensus view is that Gigantopithecus walked on all fours as a quadruped like an Orangutan or sivapithecus, not as a biped as Bigfoot is said to be, and the enormous mass of Gigantopithicus would have made it nearly impossible for it to adopt a bipedal gait.

• The fossil record provides no support for sasquatch: there is ample fossil evidence in North America of prehistoric species of bear, cougar, moose and mammoth. Yet, aside from clearly human remains, there is no evidence of a prehistoric hominid. No one has coproliths from a Bigfoot.

• Some cryptozoologists have argued the most persuasive evidence for Bigfoot's existence is a high number (between 1000 and 1500) of eyewitness reports from individuals who claim to have clearly seen creatures they describe as large, bipedal and apelike. Some consider such circumstantial evidence persuasive. See List of Notable Bigfoot Sightings and Reports below.

• Photographs or plaster casts of footprints are often cited by cryptozoologist as important evidence, while others have argued such footprints are hoaxed.

• Reports of large, bipedal hominid-like creatures from the remote wilderness exist from well before any hoaxers were born, however—including one sighting by President Theodore Roosevelt. Unknown large primates have been reported in wilderness regions on every continent except Antarctica. One of the more famous is the Yeti (or Abominable Snowman) of the Himalayas. Enthusiasts go so far as to theorize that at least some of these reports could be of present-day specimens of the giant ape Gigantopithecus.

• There have been reports of sasquatch hair and feces , but the conclusions of analyses are frequently disputed.

• Some cryptozoologists have attempted to place Bigfoot into a taxonomic scientific classification as a primate. If an animal like Sasquatch ever existed in North America, a more likely candidate would be a species of Paranthropus, such as Paranthropus robustus, which would have looked very much like Sasquatch, including the crested skull and naturally bipedal gait.

• There is also a little known subspecies of Homo erectus known as meganthropus which actually did grow to enormous proportions, though newest remains of the hominid pre-date 1 million years and have only be found several thousand miles away from North America.

• 1811: Surveyor David Thompson reported large footprints near Jasper, Alberta Canada
• 1840: Reverend Elkanah Walker records reports of hairy giants among Spokane Native Americans.
• 1893: An account by Theodore Roosevelt is published this year. He relates a story told him by "a beaten old mountain hunter, named Bauman". Some have suggested similarities to Bigfoot reports. [1]
• 1924: Albert Ostman claims to have been kidnapped and held captive by a sasquatch.
• 1924: Ape Canyon: Fred Beck and others claim to have been attacked by several sasquatch.
• 1967: Patterson-Gimlin film

1. The method of locomotion for Gigantopithicus is not entirely certain, as no pelvis or leg bone has been found, the only remains of Gigantopithicus discovered are teeth and mandible. A minority opinion championed by Grover Krantz holds that the mandible shape and structure suggests bipedal locomotion. The only fossil evidence of gigantopithecus--the mandible and teeth--are U-shaped, like bipedal humans, rather than V-shaped like the great apes. A complete fossil specimen with the pelvis and leg bones would be necessary to conclusively resolve the debate one way or the other, and have to date never been found.
2. Gorillas are in the same class as chimpanzees; gorillas are more closely related to humans and chimpanzees than they are orangutans

• Almas (cryptozoology)
• Orang Pendak
• Skunk Ape
• Yeti
• Yowie
• Yeren
• Troll

• "Lovable trickster created a monster with Bigfoot hoax"
• for more information on sivapithecus the common ancestor to both orangutans and gigantopithecus http://www.uiowa.edu/~bioanth/giganto.html